Sunday, April 15, 2012

Scenario Consultation: American Police Sidearms in the 1950s

An author presented me with the following plotline query:  A Tulsa, Oklahoma police sergeant is murdered in 1957.  The murderer is another Tulsa policeman, and the murder was committed with a handgun connected to the murderer's police duties.  For the sake of historical accuracy, the author is interested in knowing what handguns were prevalent among police agencies during the late 1950s.

The Revolver is King

Colt Single Action Army
For about a century, from the late 19th century through the mid 1980s, the double action revolver reigned supreme as the law enforcement sidearm of choice in the United States.  While some law enforcement agencies opted for single action revolvers such as the Colt Single Action Army (or "Peacemaker"), or semiautomatic pistols like the Colt Government Model in either .45 ACP or .38 Super caliber or the Colt Model 1903 and Model 1908 "Pocket Hammerless" pistols in .32 ACP and .380 ACP respectively, these were very much the exception.  As a rule, the preponderance of American policemen, of all ranks, were armed with revolvers made by industry giants Colt and Smith & Wesson.
Colt Model 1903 Pocket Hammerless

Mid-Bores Predominate

At the end of the 19th century, it wasn't uncommon to find police service weapons chambered for relatively small bore or low powered cartridges such as the .32 Smith & Wesson Long or the .38 New Police.

(Trivia point:  The .38 New Police and the .38 Smith & Wesson are the same cartridge.  Colt, understandably, did not want to provide free advertising for their rival, Smith & Wesson, and so coined a new name!)

.38 Special Cartridges
This was to change in 1899 with the introduction of the smokeless propellant variant of the .38 Smith & Wesson Special (or .38 Special) cartridge.  It's important to note that prior to its respecification in 1972 by the American firearms industry standards organization, the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI), the .38 Special was a significantly higher performing cartridge.  The traditional loading for a .38 Special is a 158 grain lead round nose (LRN) bullet.  Ballistics on the modern, post-1972 loading have a muzzle velocity of between 750 and 780 feet per second, for a relatively mild energy of about 205 foot/pounds, approximating that of the .38 Long Colt and .38 Smith & Wesson cartridges it theoretically made obsolete. The pre-1972 loadings for the .38 Special were an entirely different matter.  They propelled the same 158 grain lead bullet about 200 feet per second faster - between 930 and 970 feet per second, and generated a muzzle energy of between 310 and 320 foot pounds.  While this level of performance certainly isn't .44 Magnum territory, it is respectable and  comparable to the performance of the 9mm Parabellum cartridges adopted by American police agencies in the 1980s and 1990s.

In 1930, Smith & Wesson began offering a variant of its large frame .44 Hand Ejector Third Model revolver chambered for a variant of the .38 Special called the .38/44 Heavy Duty.  The new cartridge, developed in cooperation with Remington, was called the .38/44 High Velocity. It used the .38 Special's case, but pushed the 158 grain bullet at around 1,115 feet per second, generating about 440 foot-pounds of energy.  In doing so, it offered direct competition to Colt's .38 Super pistols.

S&W .38/44 Heavy Duty
The .38/44 Heavy Duty sold well, and equipped many law enforcement personnel in the early to mid 1930's, but in 1935 Smith & Wesson and Winchester rendered the .38/44 obsolete with the introduction of the .357 Magnum cartridge.  This cartridge was similar to the .38 Special, but used a case 1/8" longer, and operated at almost twice the pressure, propelling the 158 grain bullet to almost 1,500 feet per second and generating a whopping 770 - 780 foot pounds of energy.

American law enforcement was thus well served with the medium bore .38 Special for everyday work and .357 Magnum when greater range or penetration (automobile doors for example) was required.  Consequently, both Colt and Smith & Wesson offered a number of revolvers chambered for these cartridges and geared toward law enforcement.  These revolvers would dominate the American law enforcement market until they were supplanted by semiautomatic pistols in the 1980s and 1990s.  The following is a brief survey of Colt and Smith & Wesson offerings that would have been popular with American police agencies in the late 1950s:


Colt

Colt Detective Special
Detective Special:  The Colt Detective Special was a small frame revolver chambered for  the .38 Special cartridge.  It was produced between 1927 and 1986, and was marketed as an easily concealable handgun suited for use by detectives, plain clothes policemen or other law enforcement requiring easily hidden firepower.  It was typically found with a two inch barrel and had a six round cylinder.




Colt Official Police
Official Police:  The Official Police was Colt's offering for the uniformed policeman's standard service weapon market.  This medium frame revolver was extremely prolific in the 1950s, and was produced between 1927 and 1969.  It could be found with barrels of four, five and six inches and had a six round cylinder.




Colt Police Positive Special
Police Positive Special:  The Police Positive Special was another Colt offering for the  standard service weapon market.  It was based on Colt's small frame (like the Detective Special) and, like the Official Police, was extremely prolific in the 1950s.  It was also long lived, being produced between 1908 and 1995.  It could be found with barrels of four and six inches and had a six round cylinder.

Smith & Wesson

S&W Military & Police
Military & Police Model 1905 4th Change:  The Smith & Wesson Military & Police (M&P) revolver could be the single most prolific revolver in history with some six million examples being produced.  This medium frame revolver was introduced in 1899 and is still in production.  In 1957, Smith & Wesson stopped using names for its products and assigned model numbers to existing products.  The .38 Special M&P became known as the Model 10.  Model 10s are found with two, two and a half, three, four, five and six inch barrels.  The M&P/Model 10 cylinder holds six rounds.

S&W Model 19
Model 19:  The Model 19 uses the same medium frame as the Model 10, but is chambered for the .357 Magnum cartridge.  It barely makes it into the running for this list as it was introduced to the Smith & Wesson line in 1957 (it's still in production).  Generally found with either a four or six inch barrel, the Model 19's cylinder holds 6 rounds.




S&W Registered Magnum
Model 27:  The .357 Magnum Model 27 was the first "Magnum" handgun ever produced.  It was introduced in 1935 as the "Registered Magnum," retitled in 1939 to the ".357 Magnum," and again in 1957 to the "Model 27." It is based on Smith & Wesson's large revolver frame and has been produced with three and a half, four, five, six, six and a half and eight and three eighths inch barrels.  Registered Magnum and .357 Magnum variants with three and a half inch barrels were very popular with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other law enforcement agencies in the period from the 1940s through the mid-1960s.

S&W Model 28 Highway Patrolman
Model 28:  Originally introduced as the "Highway Patrolman" in 1954, the Model 28 is identical to the Model 27 with the exception of the gun's finish.  Offered as a lower cost alternative to the Model 27, the Model 28 lacked the former's highly polished, mirror blued finish, opting for a matte finish on exterior surfaces that were not as polished.  Mechanically the two were identical, as was performance.
 

S&W Model 36 Chief's Special
Chief's Special:  The Chief's Special (the Model 36 after 1957) was Smith & Wesson's small frame response to the Colt Detective Special.  Introduced in 1950 and still in production, variants found in the mid to late 1950s would have been chambered for the .38 Special and equipped with a one and seven eighths inch barrel.  Unlike the Colts, the small frame Smith & Wessons have a five round cylinder.  The Chief's Special, ans the name implies, was marketed toward higher ranking police officers who wanted a smaller, lighter sidearm.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Firearms, Hacking and Action Choreography Workshop


For those of you in and about the greater Cincinnati area, I will be presenting a one day workshop on firearms, hacking, and the choreography of action and violence sequences this Saturday, April 14.

The workshop will include modules on:

Introduction to Firearms & Ammunition;
Tactics, Techniques & Procedures;
Terminal Ballistics;
Hacking Cyber Crime;
The Choreography of Direct Action; and

a "hands on show and tell" to familiarize participants with modern revolvers, semiautomatic pistols and assault rifles.

The workshop will take place at the Kings Island Conference Center, 5691 Kings Island Drive Mason, OH 45040, from 10:00 AM to approximately 5:30 PM.

The workshop is sponsored by the Ohio Valley Romance Writers of America.

For more information on the workshop or to register, see:

http://ovrwa.com/april-2012/

Thanks!

Adam

The Safety Dance (With Apologies to Men Without Hats)


Things like this make me CRAZY:

She peered around the edge of the doorway.  Harry the Horse and Big Julie were huddled over the table, staring at the cards in their fists, blissfully unaware that death stood on the other side of the door jamb.  She took a moment, forcing herself to center, controlling her breathing, achieving an inner calm.  In a few moments, nerves and worry were gone, and all that remained was a cold, steely determination.  She reached back and curled her fingers around the butt of the Smith & Wesson Model 686 .357 Magnum revolver holstered behind her right hip.  With a practiced tug, she pulled it from the holster, flipped off the safety….

Grrrrr! <Said through gritted teeth> "Revolvers. Don’t. Have. Safeties."*

That’s usually the place where I put the book down and walk away or fight the temptation to run screaming from the  movie, frustrated by the lack of accuracy. Since I hate to walk away from a perfectly good book, a general discussion of the mechanical safety mechanisms found on handguns might be useful for those of you involved with writing books or producing movies.  Especially if you have curmudgeons like me in your audience.

Manual Safety on a Browning Hi-Power
Let’s be clear from the start:  An external, manual “safety,” or safety catch is a mechanical mechanism that is designed to reduce the likelihood of an unintentional or accidental discharge of a firearm.  It is usually a switch that, when engaged, prevents the firearm from discharging when the trigger is pulled.  Typically, the switch interposes a mechanical block that prevents either the trigger, the sear (the intermediary component acted upon by the trigger that holds and/or releases the firing mechanism) or the firing mechanism itself from moving.  Ideally, the safety must never interfere with the intentional discharge of the firearm.

Risky Business

Safeties are about managing risk and probability, not providing mechanical absolutes.  Mechanical devices can, and routinely do, fail.  Certainty can be achieved only by never loading the firearm.  Importantly, in cases where other functional attributes of the firearm manage the risk of unintentional discharge to an acceptable level, external/manual safeties are either redundant or omitted from the design entirely.

To understand safeties, it is necessary to understand what comprises the “risk condition” in a firearm.  This, in turn, requires a bit of knowledge as to how firearms and ammunition work.  

Bang for the Buck

Cartridge Components
Ammunition functions on the principle that the controlled burning of a given amount of solid propellant will cause the generation of rapidly expanding combustion gases, and that the expansion of these gases will force a projectile down the barrel and toward the target.  Reliable ignition of the propellant is ensured through the use of a chemical primer compound.  The primer compound is impact sensitive, meaning that it detonates when struck sharply, producing a short, intensely hot flame. (Think of the cap guns you had when you were a kid.)  It is this flame that ignites the propellant.



A (Spring) Loaded Question

Note firing pin and hammer
The role of the firearm’s firing mechanism is to consistently transfer kinetic energy to the primer compound.  Typically, this is done by causing a steel firing pin to strike the base of a cartridge, where the primer is located.  The motive energy that moves the steel pin is stored in a compressed spring (the “mainspring”).  The spring is held under compression by a mechanical block until it is released by the trigger to either act directly on the firing pin or to forcefully rotate a hammer, which strikes the firing pin, causing it to move rapidly forward.

These basic mechanics result in the existence of three distinct operating modes for a firearm:

  • Rest, when mainspring is relaxed and there is no energy stored to propel the firing pin;
  • Ready, when the mainspring is compressed, storing energy to propel the firing pin; and
  • Firing, the instant when the mainspring is released, expending energy and propelling the firing pin into the primer at the base of the cartridge.
Risk Model for Unintentional Discharge
Of the three, the risk space for unintentional discharge settles by a wide margin (some studies say as much as 9:1) in the Ready mode.

Safeties then, are a means of mitigating the risks attendant to having a compressed spring behind a firing mechanism that is restrained only by a controlled release mechanism (i.e., the trigger/sear).

Options

Safety on a Luger Pistol
The manual safety, like those found on a German P.08 Luger or an American M1911A1 pistol is one option to mitigate the risk of an unintentional discharge.  It is ideally suited for single action pistols where the Ready mode is a normal mode of carriage, where rapid employment not requiring manipulation of the breech mechanism is desired and where the pistol’s design precludes bringing it into operation without first manually compressing the mainspring.  

Colt Single Action Army.  No safety.
However, the manual safety is only one mitigation to the risk problem, and incidentally, not the first.  The original mitigation is found on single action revolvers like the Colt Single Action Army, was simply never to cock the pistol (and therefore compress the mainspring) unless it was desired to immediately bring the pistol into action.  This is a training mitigation (or, as those of us on the military end of the spectrum like to say a “tactics, techniques and procedures” (TTP) fix).  While it may not directly answer the mail, it does make for a mechanically simpler and therefore more robust design.

The most effective option, from a risk mitigation perspective, was to all but eliminate the need for a Ready mode.  If the trigger can be made to perform TWO functions; that is, both cocking the firing mechanism (compressing the mainspring) *AND* releasing the firing to hit the primer, there is no need to secure the firing mechanism against the force of the compressed mainspring.  Thus was born the double action pistol.

Double action S&W M60. No safety
On a double action pistol, the amount of force that needs to be applied to the trigger to overcome both the mainspring weight and the mechanical interplay of the fire control components is significant; between eleven and fifteen pounds of force is required to overcome the mechanical disadvantage and fire the pistol.  The possibility of this amount of force being applied accidentally is remote, and as a result there are almost no double action revolvers on the market today that have an external mechanical safety.  (As a note, most modern double action revolvers feature a number of internal, passive safety mechanisms intended to minimize the chances of a discharge should the firearm be inadvertently dropped.)

FN P45. That's a decocker, not a safety.
The lack of an external, manual safety is also a feature of modern double action semi-automatic pistols, for much the same reasons discussed with respect to revolvers.  However, double action semi-automatic pistols present a somewhat different risk mitigation challenge than double action revolvers.  Specifically, at the completion of a firing cycle that has not exhausted the ammunition supply, a double action revolver returns to the Rest mode.  A double action semi-automatic pistol on the other hand, returns to the Ready mode (Glocks and “Double Action Only” pistols are exceptions to this rule).  To allow the pistol to be safely returned to the Rest mode, many double action pistols have a decocking mechanism.  The decocker, while having the external appearance of a manual safety, performs an entirely different function.  It allows the mainspring to be safely decompressed without discharging the pistol.  As an aside some pistols, notably James Bond’s Walther PPK, combine the functions of safety and decocker in a single lever. (As a note, most modern double action pistols feature a number of internal, passive safety mechanisms intended to minimize the chances of a discharge should the firearm be inadvertently dropped.)
Walther PPK. Combined decocker and safety.

Conclusion

In sum, the manual external safety is a device intended to mitigate the risks attendant to carrying a cocked pistol with a round of ammunition ready.  The following is a quick cheat sheet that might be useful when arming your characters:

  • Single Action Revolvers (think “cowboy guns”): No external safety
  • Double Action Revolvers (think “police pistols from the 30s - 70s”):  No external safety
  • Single Action Semi-Automatic Pistols (think “GI .45s”):  External manual safety
  • Double Action Semi-Automatic Pistols (think modern military pistols):  External manual decocker
  • Glocks: No external safety
 *For every rule, there are, of course, exceptions.  The German Model 1879 Reichsrevolver, the Webley-Fosbery Automatic Revolver and the Mateba Model 6 Unica Autorevolver all have safeties.  They’re also rare, obsolete or a combination thereof.  Then there are folks in the “can’t let well enough alone club” like  Tarnhelm Supply, who are always seeking to gild the lily.

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Reading the Tea Leaves: A Foray into the Next War

It’s difficult not to pay attention to the saber rattling in the Middle East, not with gas prices approaching or exceeding $4.00 per gallon in most of the United States and a constant barrage of articles on the news wires like THIS, THIS , and THIS.  I’m neither a politician nor a diplomat, but I am a military analyst and weapons technology expert with a more than passing familiarity with the weapons and forces that will shape a potential conflict.  I’ll beg your indulgence while I engage in a bit of military futurism.
---
Setting the Stage
Let’s say we have three countries, Freedonia, Sylvania and Trentino.*  

Freedonia

Freedonia is a global superpower, with military forces and commitments spread around the world.  These forces are well equipped with modern weapons, electronics and communications.  Freedonia has a vital strategic interest in the part of the world (let’s call it the “Meso-Orientale”) where both Sylvania and Trentino are situated.  This strategic interest is due to the fact that a large portion of Freedonia’s energy supplies come from petroleum drilling in Meso-Orientalian countries.  Much of this petroleum is shipped in tankers through a narrow waterway off of Trentino’s southern coast.

Sylvania

Sylvania is a dominant regional power whose forces are at least as well equipped as those of Freedonia.  It is surrounded by states that are politically and, given its position as the world’s only Semitic state,  theologically hostile to it.  It has fought six wars with some or all of these states since its founding in the late 1940s, and faces an ongoing threat of terrorism from organizations claiming to represent an indigenous population group that, for various reasons, was displaced by Sylvania’s founding.  These groups are supplied and funded by Trentino, and regularly launch mortar and rocket attacks against Sylvanian cities.  To defend against these attacks, Sylvania has developed an indigenous integrated radar and interceptor rocket system called “Steel Roof.”  Sylvania is widely thought to be a nuclear power, but there has never been any objective confirmation or denial of this capability. 

Trentino

Trentinan uranium enrichment facility, near Qom.
Trentino is a regional power.  For most of the 20th century, Trentino’s political orientation was western, and it was seen as a vital bulwark against communist expansion during the Cold War.  During the latter half of the century, Trentino received significant military and technical aid from both Freedonia and Sylvania.  In the late 1970s, Trentino’s monarchy was overthrown by a popular revolution organized around fundamentalist religious lines, and a “revolutionary” theocracy was established.  The new government was vehemently anti-western, and even held a number of Freedonian diplomats hostage for over 400 days.  Trentino’s revolutionary government is also opposed to the existence of the Sylvanian state, and regularly broadcasts speeches and platforms that both support anti-Sylvanian terrorism and urge that Sylvania be wiped off the face of the planet.  Trentino has been attempting to develop what it calls a “peaceful nuclear capability” since prior to the overthrow of the monarchy.  It is generally believed that Trentino’s nuclear ambitions are geared more toward the development of deliverable nuclear weapons and less toward providing electricity for its population.

Tensions

Anti-Freedonian rally in Trentino
Recently, both Freedonian and Sylvanian intelligence services have reported that Trentino is rapidly approaching a nuclear threshold.  Economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations have been ineffective in deterring Trentinan nuclear development.  Additionally, it is believed that the downward spiral of the Trentinan economy may be forcing the government to accelerate the nuclear program as a means of distracting and placating a restive population.  The imminence of a nuclear capable Trentino is of great concern to Freedonia due to its energy interests in the region, but of existential concern to Sylvania, which Trentino has, many times, sworn to wipe from the face of the planet with “hellfire.”
 
As a result of these concerns, the Sylvanians are actively planning for a contingency operation in which the Sylvanian Air Force will destroy the dozen or so Trentinan nuclear facilities in a surprise precision attack. Meanwhile, the Freedonian administration, which is notably more distant in its relations with Sylvania than previous administrations, is both advising restraint and admonishing Sylvania as to the dire consequences of unilateral action.  However, the Sylvanian government remains adamant that its priority is to protect and preserve the Sylvanian state.   Trentino is making no effort to diminish tensions, in fact, quite the opposite.  The Trentinan government routinely threatens both Freedonia and Sylvania.  In fact, itwas recently discovered that Trentinan agents in Kush had been planning to bomba Sylvanian ship as it transited the Alexandria Canal.  

Action

In early April, the Sylvanian government is advised by its intelligence agencies, and very likely, those of regional allies, that left unhindered, Trentino will be able to build a nuclear weapon within three months.  Faced with this stark reality, the Sylvanian government reluctantly authorizes the strike.  

Day 1

As darkness falls on April 24th, Sylvanian aircraft take to the skies.  These, however, are not the F-16 and F-15 fighters that will bear the brunt of the fight, but Eitan, Harpy and Harop Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV).
 
Eitan MALE UAV
The Eitan, a Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAV serves as a reconnaissance platform, providing real-time feedback to Sylvanian strike controllers as to the state and condition of Trentinan defenses.  However, a number of the Eitans have been modified to carry electronic warfare payloads.  These payloads give the Trentinans tremendous capabilities, from mimicking a maintenance cell phone signal that puts a cell network out of action by commanding it to “sleep” to jammers that interfere with first responder emergency frequencies and signal generators that at one moment will spoof the  Trentinan air defense radars so that at first they see a perfectly clear sky and at the next moment see a sky filled with many hundreds of aircraft.

Harpy UCAV
The Harpy and Harop are stealthy Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAV) designed to quietly loiter around the battlespace until air defense radars begin emitting their search and tracking signals. Once Trentinan radars light up, the UCAVs dive into them and detonate their integral warhead, effectively suppressing Trentino’s ability to engage Sylvanian strike aircraft.
Harop UCAV
MSOV
The UAVs are followed a few hours later by waves of Sylvanian F-16  and F-15 aircraft.  Some are carrying precision guided penetrator munitions designed to burrow dozens of feet into reinforced concrete before detonating.  Others are carrying Runway Attack Munitons (RAM) which release dozens of penetrating submunitions that crater a runway, rendering it useless, or the Modular Stand-Off Vehicle (MSOV), a precision guided, missile shaped gliding  vehicle that can be programmed to fly over an air base and dispense homing bomblets intended to destroy aircraft on the ground.

Runway Attack Munition
 Some aircraft are fitted entirely with air-to-air missiles, intended to counter any Trentinan aircraft that get off the ground.
Before the Sylvanian aircraft enter Trentinian airspace, Sylvanian cyberwarfare experts – the country’s militarized hackers – launch a pair of devastating cyberattacks.  The first introduces a virus into the Trentinan electrical grid, which has been left connected to the Internet.  Minutes after virus is loosed, power plants in Trentino’s cities begin to malfunction, and the country is plunged into darkness.  Backup power systems come online, but these do the Trentinans no good as the second half of the Sylvanian cyber attack, a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack of enormous proportions, hits.  All Trentinan command and control nodes that rely on the Internet are suddenly unable to function.
Sylvanian F-15I Raam
The Eitans enter first, broadcasting signals that convince the Trentinan air defense systems that all is well, despite frantic calls from the national command.   When the Harops and Harpys are in position, the Eitans switch signals, convincing the Trentinan air defense radars that the sky is full of attackers.  One by one, Trentinan radars power up, searching the sky for likely targets for Trentino’s S-200 and S-400 Surface to Air Missiles (SAM)….and, one by one, the Sylvanian Harops and Harpys destroy the radars.
Trentinan S-400 SAM Launcher and Radar
Moments later, the first Sylvanian strike aircraft scream into the dark Trentinan sky.   Groups peel off in search of individual targets.  Some head toward Trentinan nuclear sites, some toward Trentinan airfields and some toward other targets. Within an hour, the nuclear sites are little more than smoking ruins and the majority of the Trentinan Air Force has been destroyed on the ground.  Thirty minutes later, the Sylvanian pilots are streaking for home.  It has been a complete and total victory.  Later estimates will determine that the that the Trentinan nuclear program has been set back by four to five years, and that it will be the better part of a year before Trentino has meaningful air defenses.  It has not, however, been a bloodless victory.   Nearly 20% of the attacking Sylvanian aircraft have fallen to Trentinan gun and missile systems that were not suppressed by the initial attacks against the air defense grid.
The returning Sylvanian pilots are greeted as heroes.
Day 2
GBU-28 Penetrator Bomb
By the end of the day, Trentinan repair crews have restored power to critical command and control infrastructure.  The damage assessment is ongoing, but it is worse than the Trentinans expected.  Burying the nuclear sites failed to provide adequate protection against the Sylvanian GBU-28 and GBU-37 penetrator bombs.  Both they and the Trentinan long range missile sites are complete losses.  Worse, almost all the modern aircraft Trentino possessed were destroyed on the ground, with the exception of an F-14A Tomcat and a MiG-29C that were blown out of the sky by a Sylvanian F-15I .
Trentinan F-14A Tomcat Fighter and Aircrew
SS Oceania
Trentinan Moudge Class Frigate Jamaran
The Trentinan government is, not surprisingly, furious.  It blames not only Sylvania, but the west in general and Freedonia in particular.  In retaliatory action, the Trentinan Navy is ordered to close the Straits of Dalat, a narrow, 21 mile wide waterway through which much of the world’s crude oil flows.  Trentinan Houdong and Kaman class missile boats and  Moudge class frigates take to the waves.  A standoff occurs between the SS Oceania, a Freedonian flagged TI class supertanker and the Moudge class frigate Jamaran.  The Oceania refuses to heave to, even after the Jamaran fires a burst of 40mm shells across her bow.  The Jamaran’s captain calls for instructions and is told to sink the Oceania.   Obeying orders, the Jamaran looses a pair of C-802/Noor anti-shipping missiles into the Oceania.  The Oceania’s double hull keeps her afloat, but the flames and pillar of smoke from the burning tanker can be seen for many miles.
Shipping companies order their ships to observe the Trentinan blockade.
Overnight, the price of gasoline spikes forty cents.





Day 3
FNS Ticonderoga Class Cruiser Cold Harbor
Trentinan C-802/Noor Missile
In response to the Trentinan closure of the Straits of Dalat, the Freedonian administration orders the Freedonian Navy’s 11th Fleet to reopen the waterway and maintain freedom of the seas.  A Freedonian Ticonderoga class guided missile cruiser, the FNS Cold Harbor is dispatched to escort stranded tankers through the strait.  As it approaches, it is hailed by a Trentinan frigate.  The Trentinans inform the Cold Harbor that the strait is closed, and that she is to turn around or be fired up.  The Cold Harbor continues her approach.  The Trentinan frigate fires a Noor missile at the Cold Harbor, which the Cold Harbor’s Phalanx Close In Weapon Systems (CIWS) blow into shrapnel.  The Cold Harbor continues to sail into the strait.  Suddenly, the ship’s radars and early warning systems begin to blare.  Incoming missiles.  Dozens of them have been launched from Trentinan shore sites and are streaking toward the ship at nearly the speed of sound.  The ship’s defenses are simply saturated, and no fewer than eleven C-802 and C-803 missiles strike her.  The Cold Harbor sinks within an hour.  The Trentinan government declares the action an act of Freedonian aggression, and moves mechanized formations of the Trentinan Army toward its western border, within striking distance of the major petroleum producing nations of the Meso-Orientale. 
Trentinan Zulfiqar-1 Main Battle Tank
The Trentinan Army is large, comprising some 850,000 men under arms.  These are divided into five corps level regional commands which can call upon four armored divisions, six mechanized infantry divisions, one special forces division, two commando divisions and an airborne division.  It fields some 1,600 main battle tanks including indigenous designs like the Zulfiqar  and Mobarez as well as foreign vehicles such as the T-72, T-62, M60A1, Chieftain, Type 59 and M48 Patton.  The diversity of equipment creates logistics problems, and many formations are formidable on paper, but lack necessary spares and ammunition supplies, rendering them significantly less combat effective.
Day 4
Freedonian Seawolf Class Attack Submarine
The Freedonian national command authority reacts swiftly to the crisis.  Within an hour of the Cold Harbor’s sinking Freedonian reconnaissance UAVs are in the air over the Gulf of Dalat, pinpointing the location and status of every Trentinan naval vessel.  Additional reconnaissance assets patrol the skies over western Trentino, identifying and locating the positions taken up by Trentinan ground forces.  The Freedonian Navy orders additional Virginia, Seawolf and Los Angeles class attack submarines as well Ohio class cruise missile submarines to take up positions in the Gulf.  As the attack submarines arrive in the Gulf, they begin to silently locate and shadow Trentinan Kilo class and Nahang class submarines as well as Trentinan surface ships.  The Freedonian Air Force scrambles squadrons of B-52, B-1 and B-2 long range strategic bombers, and puts tactical fighter squadrons forward deployed in the Meso-Orientale on alert.  Two additional Nimitz class aircraft carrier strike groups are ordered to the region.
Day 5
Tanker ships remain bottled up in the Gulf of Dalat, and the global economic impacts are both swift and severe.  The Freedonian national average price for a gallon of unleaded regular gasoline jumps to $5.75.  Similar impacts are felt in the surging economies of the People’s Sinosian Hegemony and Hindustan as well as in Europe and South America. 
Trentinan Submarine Yunes 903
Freedonian Tomahawk Cruise Missile
In the pre-dawn hours, the Freedonian naval and air assault begins.  The Freedonian attack submarines Alaska, Oregon and Tigershark fire Mk. 48 Advanced Capability (ADCAP) torpedoes that strike and sink the Trentinan submarines Tareq 901, Noor 902, Yunes 903 and Nahang.  Simultaneously, Freedonian cruise missile submarines and guided missile destroyers and cruisers launch salvoes of Tomahawk cruise missiles against Trentinan Navy command and control facilities, remaining air defense systems and ships in port.  Particularly hard hit are vessels and storage facilities believed to support the Trentinan Navy’s mine warfare capability.  Freedonian strategic bombers begin to pound both Trentinan ground forces deployed along the country’s western border and long range ballistic missile sites.  The missiles are followed by waves of Freedonian strike aircraft launched from aircraft carriers and missile armed UAVs.  Other aircraft employ precision guided bombs to disable and sink Trentinan ships patrolling the Gulf, while the Freedonian submarines continue to hunt and sink the Trentinan Navy.
Within eight hours of the assault’s start, the Trentinan Navy effectively ceases to exist. 
Day 6
Trentinan Shahab-3 Missile
A desperate Trentinan government authorizes ballistic missile strikes against both Sylvania and Freedonian allies in the Meso-Orientale.  Four Shahab-3 missiles are launched; two targeted at Sylvania’s economic capital, Tel Aviv, and one each at Riyadh, capital of Hejaz, an oil producing desert kingdom and a Freedonian ally, and the other at Manama, capital of Dhahani, an emirate where the Freedonian 11th Fleet is based.  The Trentinan missiles are engaged by Standard SM-3 air defense missiles fired from Freedonian cruisers and destroyers in the Gulf, and three are destroyed.  The fourth missile eludes the Freedonian ballistic missile defenses and begins its descent toward Tel Aviv.  As the missile heads toward the city, the Sylvanian Steel Roof system begins to track it.  An enagagement solution is automatically calculated, and as the Trentinan missile comes within range, a salvo of Steel Roof interceptor missiles are loosed at the incoming projectile.  The Trentinan missile is destroyed at a height of 45,000 feet over a sparsely populated area.  There are no casualties.
Sylvanian Steel Roof Missile Launch
The Freedonian government, fearful of the potential diplomatic repercussions resulting in further Sylvanian actions, steps up the air campaign against Trentinan missile sites and command and control facilities.  In twenty two hours of continuous air activity, and estimated 2,200 Trentinan armored vehicles and artillery pieces have been destroyed, and military casualties are estimated in the tens of thousands.  Trentinan offensive capabilities are effectively eliminated.
Day 7
With the destruction of the Trentinan naval threat, Freedonian naval vessels, as well as those of Freedonian allies including the United Monarchy, Oceania, Teutonia and Hollandia begin escorting tankers in and out of the Gulf.  Freedonian air assets begin enforcing a no-fly zone over Trentino.  Gas prices in Freedonia, which spiked at $7.15 per gallon in parts of California and New York are slowly declining.  Additional Freedonian forces are sent to the Gulf region, but no additional threats are anticipated from Trentino in the near future.   The longer term impacts to the Freedonian, and global, economies are significant.  Capital that would have otherwise been available for business expansion and development is reallocated to basic operating expenses, and the economic recovery, fueled by job creation, is stalled. The unemployment rate, which had fallen to 8.3%, spikes to nearly 10% in the wake of the oil crisis.  Families across the income spectrum are impacted as the price of any goods that are transported, from paper to milk to clothes to vegetables rise by double digit percentages.  The grim, austere economic conditions are reflected politically, and in the presidential election, the incumbent party is soundly defeated by an angry public.
---
Coda
Fascinating as the match-up of military hardware and forces may be, it’s important to look at the root cause of the issues in the Middle East.  The Middle East matters, but why? It’s not because the world has a burning desire to solve the Israeli-Palestinian issue, or because the majority of the planet cares deeply about urban development in Dubai.  It’s because the world remains dependent on fossil fuels in general and petroleum products in particular, of which there are huge reserves in the Middle East.  As a result, blood and treasure are spilled wantonly by powers in both hemispheres seeking to either create stability in or exert control over the Middle East’s oil fields, and the region assumes a disproportionate importance on the global stage. 
The most effective response to instability in the region is to deprive it of importance.  Realization of this goal depends on the achievement of energy independence.  Remove energy dependency and the strategic rationale for defending the region disappears, as does a major bone of contention between the developed and the developing world.  The result of that disappearance is an abnormal condition called “peace.”  Despite this, no American administration in the last half century has made energy independence an overriding national priority.

* With apologies to the Marx Brothers.